Caregiver's Home Companion Free captioning phone for those with hearing loss.

Posted: May 06, 2008

When it Comes to Avoiding Stroke, It's All in the Money, Honey

The more money you have, the less likely you are to suffer a stroke? That’s what Dutch researchers say they found when they looked at stroke risk based on age, wealth and education.
And while the wealthier you are, the more likely you are to avoid stroke, the “protection” seems to break down with age, the study team said. The findings were published in Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association.
"We confirmed that lower wealth, education and income are associated with increased stroke up to age 65, and wealth is the strongest predictor of stroke among the factors we looked at," study co-author Mauricio Avendano, Ph.D., from Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, said. "After age 65, the association of education, income and wealth with stroke are very weak, and wealth did not clearly predict stroke."
The Dutch researchers defined wealth as the aggregation of all assets, including inherited money, minus any liabilities. In all, they studied the combined impact of wealth, education and income on nearly 20,000 people age 50 and older in the United States who were followed for an average of about eight years. About 1,500 people had strokes during the study period.
In the 50-64 age bracket, having greater wealth significantly lowered the odds someone would have a stroke. But after age 65, wealth didn't appear to make much difference. The authors speculate that may be because poorer people tend to die at a younger age, leaving more people who were wealthier to begin with in the older age group.
New and recurrent strokes strike about 780,000 U.S. residents annually; about 27% of strokes occur before age 65, according to American Heart Association statistics.
While previous studies have associated lower socio-economic status with higher stroke risk, little data exists on the link between socio-economic status and stroke risk in the elderly. Previous research also relied on incomplete information about financial resources.
In this study, Avendano and co-author M. Maria Glymour, Sc.D., differentiated between income (the annual earnings of all household members) and wealth (the total of all financial and housing assets - such as inherited money- minus the liabilities).
“Wealth more comprehensively reflects both lifelong earnings and inter-generational transfers, and increases access to medical care and other material and psycho-social resources,” Avendano said.
The researchers analyzed data from 19,445 participants in the ongoing University of Michigan Health and Retirement Study (HRS), which surveys Americans age 50 and older every two years. The participants were stroke-free when they entered the study in 1992, 1993 or 1998. During an average of 8.5 years, 1,542 people in the study suffered a stroke.
Researchers divided all participants’ wealth levels into six categories, and compared them to those in the 75th -89th percentile. The 75-89th percentile group represents those in the highest wealth or income groups but excludes possible outliers among the very rich – or the ultra rich.
Researchers found that the 10% with the lowest wealth had three times the stroke risk at age 50 to 64, compared with those in the 75-89th percentile. However, at age 65 and older, stroke risk was not significantly different between the two wealth groups for men or women.
“We expected wealth to be a strong predictor of stroke in the elderly,” Avendano said. “We were surprised to see that it was not associated with stroke beyond age 65.”
The authors noted that many US residents reach age 50 with few financial assets.
“Lack of material resources themselves, and particularly wealth, appears to strongly influence people’s chances to have a first stroke,” Avendano said. “From a public health perspective, this would mean that diminishing the large wealth gap at age 50-64 also could help diminish the large disparities in stroke. However, diminishing wealth inequality requires transforming structural policies beyond the healthcare system that aim to redistribute income and wealth to benefit the most disadvantaged members of society.”
Among the study’s other findings: 
Avendano and Glymour said selective survival may explain the lack of association in those over age 65: Individuals with low wealth die earlier than their richer counterparts; those who survive into old age are a selection of the healthiest.
“Thus, selective survival could artificially weaken the association between wealth and stroke,” Avendano said. “We expected this selection effect to be less marked for wealth than for income and education, but our results suggest all socioeconomic status indicators may be susceptible to the effect.”
Authors noted possible limitations to the study: self-reported stroke data may be inaccurate; risks factors of some patients may be misreported; and the direct effects of income, wealth and education may have been underestimated because the authors simultaneously adjusted for them.
Drive Longer, Stay Independent

“Further research is needed to understand why the effect of wealth, income and education on stroke is less clear beyond age 65 and the role of selective survival,” Avendano said.

Email or share this story Bookmark and Share

Search CaregiversHome
Find with keyword(s):

Enter a keyword or phrase to search CaregiversHome's archives for related news topics, the latest news stories, timely times, and reference articles.

© 2008 Pederson Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Commercial use, redistribution or other forms of reuse of this information is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Pederson Publishing.


View The Caregiver's Hotline in which this article first appeared

Back to Top

Privacy Statement Contact Us Site Map Products & Services Our Partners Advertise
© Copyright 2003-2020. Pederson Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved.